Platform-L Contemporary Art Center, Seoul, 2019

  • Black RSS Icon
  • Black Facebook Icon

1 - 12 October 2019

Platform-L Contemporary Art Center
11 Eonjuro133gil

Gangnamgu Seoul 06053

Opening ceremony 
1 October 2019

2 October 2019

A round table discussion on collaborative practice as art educational method – a study in who is teaching and who is learning. Is possible to combine art making with art teaching? Could it be a way to break hierarchical educational structures and is it desired?


With sponsorship and support from Bitglim and PASA (Photo & Science Art) Festival

중앙대학교 예술문화연구원
Chung–Ang University of Arts and Culture Research Institute

Participating institutions 2019

Art Center College of Design, Pasadena 
Chung-Ang University, CAU, Seoul
Parsons School of Design , New York
Zurich University of the Arts, ZHdK, Zurich

Silas Fong

Swetlana Heger

Gustav Hellberg

Ken Marchionno

Jim Ramer


Taehwan Jeon

Tobias Gutmann & Pablo Lienhard

Youngjoo Sul

Brett Childs

Amanda Johnson

Steven Baboun

The Project

In 1971 John Baldessari presented his, now iconic video work, I am Making Art.  The video shows the artist standing in front of the video camera making random gestures with his arms and hands. Each time he makes a new gesture he utters: “I am making art”. It is debatable if this work was made with irony or if merely was a work that followed those theories of the late sixties and early seventies that started to define institutional theories of art*. At least I am Making Art could be considered a play with a conception that art is what the artist makes. In Baldessari’s work he is the artist and as an artist he makes art. A parallel interpretation is  that his work is a celebration of art making. John Baldessari’s art constantly tends to present educational elements. His practice as both artist and teacher are tightly interwoven. It is not always the case when artists also work as educators, as the majority try to separate the two activities.

Making art and who is entitled to make art will probably be debated as long as we care for art. The art world is complex and it contains important elements that allows evasive attitudes to avoid clear cut definitions on what art is and maybe more what is good art. Art education is one of the most important gateways to the art world and thus art educational institutions operate as guarantors in making of artist. With Make – Experiments in Art Making we are trying to look at this segment of the art world. An art educational institution is a meeting point for people who want to become artists and those who are already part of it. The wannabe artists are looking for knowledge and invitations to the art world’s higher stratas, which is assumed to be bestowed by the already privileged and experienced. There are different approaches to deliver desired and required enlightenment. We are trying out collaboration as method. What happens when an established artist work closely together with non established and lesser experienced one? There are many obstacles, such as teacher-student roles and hierarchies. Some positive outcomes ought to come out of such collaborations too, what are they? 

The above described collaboration between faculty of different art teaching institutions is, as described, quite pragmatic. It is a construction to create the foundation for a laboratory exercise. It also creates a testbed for collaboration in art making and another to explore if such a practice can create a beneficial situation for teaching and learning art (making). At this stage we have reached a situation where we know nothing about what direction or directions the project is going. We launched the project with very few rules. The only rules provided was that one faculty was to work together with a student in a joint project. Deadlines for the project’s ending as well as the project essays was set. The goal was to exhibit the results in a group-show, present documentation and project essay in an anthology. 

To many people, academics and researchers this project is nothing but  shambles of loose ends. Many would feel terrified with the prospect of being thrown out into such a chaotic and unstructured situation. To artists most would probably agree that this is what their everyday situation looks like. 

The worst that can happen with Make – Experiments in Art Making is that it doesn’t discover anything new or interesting that could revolutionary art, art making or art teaching/learning. The participators will definitely learn something, if it just to admit that this time they might not have changed the world much. Certain is that all participators will have learnt something. That something we can analyse. We have to. If nothing else Make will have made us make something. That activity is crucial for art production. That’s where a project like this will make a difference. If we want art to be something more than just the copying of successful formulas we have to constantly and actively make art.

Gustav Hellberg, London, 9 September 2019

*Arthur Danto’s 1964 essay The Artworld might be the academic start of this notion, followed a decade later by George Dickie’s essay Defining Art, 1969.